Does your startup have enough stories to sustain PR?
By Joel Andren · Published by PressFriendly, a PR agency · Reviewed October 13, 2026 · Editorial standards · 12 of 21 in this section
You have enough material for ongoing media relations when the company can regularly contribute something useful to the people you want to reach. Announcements help, but so do customer experience, original data, technical expertise, and a well-supported view on changes in your market. The test is whether there is something worth saying and someone who can help say it.
You do not need a fresh launch every month. You do need more than an agency repeatedly repackaging the same announcement.
Look beyond the announcement calendar
Ask a prospective agency what it could work with between your obvious milestones. A good answer connects your actual business to subjects your audience already cares about.
Fictional example: A database startup has one product launch planned. Its engineering team also knows why migrations fail, its support team sees recurring buyer questions, and a customer may be willing to discuss a migration. Those are possible sources of useful commentary or reporting. They become viable stories only when the team has something specific to share, evidence behind it, and permission to involve the customer.
Compare these agency answers:
- Thin: “We can turn every feature release into a press release.”
- More promising: “The release is one opportunity. We would also explore what your engineers are learning about migration problems and whether a customer can explain the buying decision. First we need to see the evidence.”
The second answer shows curiosity about the business. It does not pretend every idea will become coverage.
Make room for the inputs only you can provide
The agency can find angles, research context, develop material, and handle outreach. It needs access to the people who know what is happening.
For a small team, a regular conversation and a shared list of upcoming developments may be enough. Tell the agency about meaningful product changes, customer questions, new data, interesting work, and available experts. Let it tell you which of those are worth pursuing.
Be candid about limits. If customers cannot participate, data is confidential, or the founder is unavailable, the plan should reflect that. An imaginative pitch cannot repair a missing fact or permission.
Judge the next few opportunities, not the size of the idea list
You should be able to understand what the agency wants to pursue, why someone outside the company might care, and what help it needs from you. You do not need to inspect every internal brainstorming note.
Healthy signs include different sources of stories, sensible decisions to drop weak ideas, and changes based on reporter feedback. Recycled angles, activity for its own sake, or constant requests for facts the company cannot supply deserve a conversation.
Use newsworthiness to judge the underlying premise. A useful company update may still belong in a customer email or blog rather than a reporter's inbox.
A quieter period can justify a smaller program
If the next few months offer little new evidence or available expertise, consider a project, preparation work, or a narrower scope. If there is useful material but nobody has time to contribute, fix that capacity problem before buying more outreach.
Ask the agency: “What could we credibly work on next, what do you need from us, and what would you leave alone?” Its reasoning will tell you more than a promise to keep the pipeline full.